Friday, July 9, 2010

For Jaycee Lee Dugard and children, there was a $ 20 million settlement

When kidnapper and registered sex offender Phillip Garrido and wife Nancy nevertheless have not gone to trial, as outlined by CNN, Jaycee Lee Dugard and her two teenage daughters are the recipients of a $ 20 million settlement from their case against the California State Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The lawsuit stemmed from Jaycee Dugard’s claim that parole agents were in dereliction of their duties when they failed to investigate Phillip Garrido’s residence more thoroughly, which would have showed the imprisonment of both herself and her young daughters right in Garrido’s backyard. The bill appropriating the unprecedented $ 20 million Dugard settlement flew through very easily with a 30-1 vote within the California Senate and 62-0 within the California Assembly.

Source for this article: Jaycee Lee Dugard and children receive $ 20 million settlement by Personal Money Store

Jaycee Lee Dugard disappeared for 18 years

No amount of money can give the now 30-year-old Jaycee Lee Dugard and her family back the lost years when she lived in Phillip Garrido’s makeshift backyard prison. But the $ 20 million Dugard settlement will enable Jaycee Dugard to purchase a home, pay for her children’s education and get as much therapy as is necessary, among other things. If nothing else, the scrutiny to the California State Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s methods could prevent any person else from going through a similar ordeal. As outlined by department’s report that they made, “While it is true that Garrido’s California parole was never officially violated … the department failed to properly supervise Garrido and missed numerous opportunities to discover his victims.”

Against Dugard, state officials thought they had a case

When California State officials thought at one point that they might have had enough data on their side to contest Jaycee Lee Dugard’s claim, they ultimately ruled that it was not worth bringing the case before a jury. Their case evidently would have hinged upon jurisdictional matters, reports CNN. Public relations for California would have been bad. The state decided against passing the buck and claiming that it was the responsibility of federal parole officers (instead of California State parole officers).

More information about this topic at these websites:

CNN

cnn.com/2010/CRIME/07/01/california.dugard/?hpt=T1

AP report on $ 20 million Dugard settlement:

youtube.com/watch?v=nr7xF52DMRU



No comments: